This week the randomly selected blogs are 1.The Defence Toolkit 2. Durant Barristers Blog 3. David Whelan 4.A Canadian Appeals Monitor 5. Avoid a Claim
The Defence Toolkit
The Defence Toolkit a May 14, 2022
This weekas top three summaries:A R v Barrett,A 2022 ONCA 355: #provocation,A R v Brown, 2022 SCC 18: #automatism, . . . [more]
The post Mondayas Mix appeared first on Slaw.
A book has come along that every lawyer who wishes to run a firm at its peak should not only have on his/her shelf but it should be well-thumbed, stained from coffee spills, its cover torn from constant use and sits on the corner of their desk within arm's reach for quick reference. I am speaking of "How Successful Law Firms Really Work" by David L. Ginsberg and Robert A. Feisee, published by the American Bar Association, Law Practice Division
The post How Successful Law Firms Really Work appeared first on Slaw.
David Milgaard is reported to have passed away this weekend at the age of 69. He spent 23 years in prison for a rape and murder he did not commit.
Milgaard was convicted in 1970, and spent the ages of 16 to 39 in prison, following the discovery of a nurse’s body in the snowbank. His appeal to the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal was dismissed the following year, and the Supreme Court of Canada refused him leave to appeal. That same year, a pattern of sexual assaults committed by Larry Fisher came to light, which matched the offence in question. . . . [more]
The post The Milgaard Story’s Importance for the Presumption of Innocence appeared first on Slaw.
PANAL (DROIT)A : Atant d’avis qu’il incombe aux tribunaux d’utiliser les moyens fournis par le Parlement afin de s’attaquer au mal sociA(c)tal qu’est la conduite avec les facultA(c)s affaiblies, le tribunal impose une peine d’emprisonnement de 16A ans A un accusA(c) impliquA(c) dans une collision ayant causA(c) la mort de . . . [more]
The post Summaries Sunday: SOQUIJ appeared first on Slaw.
Current postings on Slaw Jobs:
. . . [more]
The post Friday Jobs Roundup appeared first on Slaw.
Written by Daniel Standing LL.B., Editor, First Reference Inc.
Businesses that have a registered mark, name or symbol have to properly manage it if they seek to maintain their brand image as a source of economic value and stability. The value of proper trademark management is the key takeaway in the recent Federal Court decision Milano Pizza Ltd. v 6034799 Canada Inc, 2022 FC 425. In that decision, poor trademark management came back to haunt the plaintiff’s pizzeria.
Background
The claim at the heart of the case was brought forward by the Ottawa-based Milano Pizzeria, which sought to protect . . . [more]
The post Use It or Lose It: Trademark Management appeared first on Slaw.
Several times each month, we are pleased to republish a recent book review from the Canadian Law Library Review (CLLR). CLLR is the official journal of the Canadian Association of Law Libraries (CALL/ACBD), and its reviews cover both practice-oriented and academic publications related to the law.
Cross-Examination: The Pinpoint Method. By Kyla Lee. Toronto: LexisNexis, 2021. 135 p. Includes table of contents and index. ISBN 9780433514329 (softcover) $150.00.
Reviewed byA Joanna Kozakiewicz
Reference Librarian
City of Toronto, Legal Services Division
InA CLLR 47:1
Cross-Examination: The Pinpoint Method, written by criminal defense lawyer Kyla Lee, is . . . [more]
The post Book Review: Cross-Examination: The Pinpoint Method appeared first on Slaw.
When determining liability for infringement of patent, trademark and copyright, the intention of the defendant is typically not relevant. A party that uses an infringing product may still be liable for patent infringement even if they merely . . . [more]
The post Indemnity Claims in Federal Court IP Disputes appeared first on Slaw.
Steven Johnson, in a marvelously well-done article in the New York Times Magazine, sets out what machine learning is making of writing. It is the driverless car equivalent of the keyboard. Just feed in your destination and it . . . [more]
The post And Now the Driverless Keyboard appeared first on Slaw.
For this last week:
1. Brahma v. HR Services, 2022 ONSC 2645
[44] The Plaintiffas breach of the deemed undertaking rule does not, in my view, automatically attract an award of elevated costs. It turns on the particular facts of each case. The Plaintiffas counsel was unaware that any information was provided to his counterparts in the Florida action. The evidence before me regarding the breach is . . . [more]
The post Wednesday: Whatas Hot on CanLII appeared first on Slaw.
Lawyer: Iad like to see what you have in the library on the crime of jabberwock-slaying, please.
Librarian (without consulting the catalog): Yes, the seminal treatise on the topic is Carroll on Jabberwocks, shelved under call numbera| you know what, Iall just grab it off the shelf for you.
Lawyer: Thanks, Iave never really understood what call numbers are, anyway.
[Librarian returns carrying four heavy, ugly binders]
Lawyer: So, which one should I use?
Librarian: Well, you just . . . [more]
The post Loose-Leaf Legal Publications: A Dialogue appeared first on Slaw.
Research & Writing
Re: Re
Neil Guthrie
Someone recently made this comment on LinkedIn: Iam so excited re: the below. (The colon may or may not have been there.) Why not Iam so excited about this instead of the commenteras mish-mash of somewhat immature enthusiasm and the lawyer jargon of re and the below? … . . . [more]
The post Tips Tuesday appeared first on Slaw.
a<< Slip sliding away, slip sliding away
You know the nearer your destination, the more you’re slip sliding away…A a<<
Lyrics, Music and Recorded by Paul Simon.
Something extraordinary is taking place in Ontario.
Family law lawyer Russell Alexander of Russell Alexander Collaborative Family Law Lawyers of Toronto and six other locations in Ontario, Canada has started an online petition on Change.org entitled: “Petition to Amend the Requirement For In Person Court Attendances.”
What are they petitioning for, you ask? Good question:
“We, the undersigned lawyers and paralegals who practise family law, hereby petition . . . [more]
The post Are the Courts Slip-Sliding Away? appeared first on Slaw.
A provincial election is currently scheduled in Ontario for June 2, 2022. The process for this date is set under the Election Act, where the the Lieutenant Governor in Council proclaims a date for an election on a Wednesday.
Although this date was was generally anticipated, there are often a number of legal issues that emerge prior, during and following an election. In this election, just days after the election date was proclaimed, an individual sought to reserve the name Direct Democracy Party of Canada with Elections Ontario.
The process for registration is governed by s. 10 of the . . . [more]
The post Direct Democracy Ends Up in Court appeared first on Slaw.
MUNICIPAL (DROIT)A : L’adoption du rA"glement 2326, lequel limite la distribution des imprimA(c)s publicitaires, dont le Publisac, sur le territoire de la Ville de Mirabel aux citoyens qui apposeront dorA(c)navant un autocollant vert sur leur porte d’entrA(c)e ou leur boA(r)te aux lettres afin de signifier leur intention de les recevoir, . . . [more]
The post Summaries Sunday: SOQUIJ appeared first on Slaw.
Current postings on Slaw Jobs:
. . . [more]
The post Friday Jobs Roundup appeared first on Slaw.
Do you agree to things before you’ve had a chance even to think it over?
Do you find yourself overcommitted and taking care of so much business for others that you have no time left for yourself?
Altruism is the instinct to help others and is a significant value. When I ask lawyers what they like most about their work, the answer will often touch on how they help. Helping people out can be intrinsically rewarding. It feels good.
People-pleasing is the dark side of altruism. It is saying ‘yes’ and doing things out of . . . [more]
The post Making the Shift From People-Pleasing to Altruism appeared first on Slaw.
By Daniel Standing LL.B., Editor, First Reference Inc.
When an employee who is off work due to a disability is terminated, there are typically red flags signaling a potential situation of discrimination. The Canadian Human Rights Tribunal’s decision in Fick v Loomis Express, 2022 CHRT 2 (CanLII) confirms that it is not always as it seems. Despite bad first appearances, the employer’s actions can be found legitimate, countering a claim of discrimination.
Background
Warren Fick worked as a delivery driver for Loomis Express in Slave Lake, Alberta. He did so without incident from 1997 until 2006, when he had . . . [more]
The post Bad Optics: Looking Beyond First Impressions in Discrimination Cases appeared first on Slaw.
In “The Litigator and Mental Health“, Chief Justice Strathy writes about mental health in our profession and what we can do to improve it. Unfortunately, practicing law can be damaging to one’s mental health. In fact, there is a strong correlation between traditional markers of success in the law and depression in lawyers.
One of the recommendations, Justice Strathy makes is eradicating the myth of the “fearless gladiator”. The fearless gladiator powers through long work hours with pride, never breaking emotionally, never taking time off, focuses exclusively on work, and has a stay-at-home spouse to take care of . . . [more]
The post The Litigator and Mental Health – a Must Read Article by Chief Justice Strathy of Ontario appeared first on Slaw.
For this last week:
1. Render v. ThyssenKrupp Elevator (Canada) Limited, 2022 ONCA 310
[78] In my view, the appellant is entitled to receive his proved statutory benefits unless that entitlement is precluded by the wording of ss. 2(1)3 and 9(1)6. ESA entitlements are statutory and disentitlement cannot be achieved by agreement, unless to provide for a greater benefit to the employee: ESA, s. 5(1). . . . [more]
The post Wednesday: Whatas Hot on CanLII appeared first on Slaw.
The point of making ADR more diverse a| is that this element of the legal system remains out of touch with the reality of society, the wider workforce, and the legal profession.
Ontario Bar Association Working Group on Neutral Diversity, aNeutral Diversity in Ontarioa, March 2022
We have two systems of justice in Canada – the public system of courts and tribunals – and the private system of ADR (mediation and arbitration). The focus of my previous columns has been mostly on the former. In this column I want to turn the focus to the private ADR system.
There are . . . [more]
The post Diversity and Private Sector Neutrals: A Call for Action appeared first on Slaw.
Research & Writing
Esports
Neil Guthrie
This is now a thing, as they say. Iam not entirely sure what it all involves, but then Iam not that keen on the non-electronic version of sports. My interest in esports is orthographical, naturally. Why no hyphen (e-sports)? … . . . [more]
The post Tips Tuesday appeared first on Slaw.
The post You Say You Want an Evolution appeared first on Slaw.
TheA Charter‘s right to counsel under s. 10(b) is an often misunderstood and confused right by many members of the public. This confusion likely emerges from unintentional analogies to the commonly cited American case Miranda v. Arizona, 86 S. Ct. 1602 (1966) in television and movies.
The Court did adopt elements that mirroredA MirandaA rights in the early Charter case of R. v. Brydges, 1990 CanLII 123 (SCC). The Court found that s. 10(b) meant that police have a duty to informed individuals who are detained or arrested of their right to retain and instruct counsel, and . . . [more]
The post Importance of Right to Counsel appeared first on Slaw.
PANAL (DROIT)A : La preuve permettait au juge de conclure que l’appelant avait tirA(c) profit des vulnA(c)rabilitA(c)s psychologiques de la plaignante et de sa dA(c)pendance A la cocaA-ne pour la recruter, qu’il avait exercA(c) une emprise sur la vie de celle-ci et qu’elle A(c)tait dans une situation d’exploitation, et ce, . . . [more]
The post Summaries Sunday: SOQUIJ appeared first on Slaw.
Current postings on Slaw Jobs:
. . . [more]
The post Friday Jobs Roundup appeared first on Slaw.
Written by Lewis Waring, Paralegal, Student-at-Law (third year), Editor, First Reference Inc.
In Oostlander v Cervus Equipment Corporation (aOostlandera), the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench subtracted an employee’s payments under the Canada Emergency Response Benefit (CERB) program from their entitlement to reasonable notice following their wrongful dismissal. While the 36-year employee’s entitlement to damages after receiving one month of notice was not in question, the Albertan court’s decision to subtract the amount they had received under the CERB program represents a regional answer to an evolving question throughout the country. Whether this Western approach to CERB will emerge into a . . . [more]
The post Alberta Court Subtracts CERB From Dismissal Notice appeared first on Slaw.
The post Donat Dabble in Family Law: A Lesson in Negligence appeared first on Slaw.
Page took 8 seconds to load.